"I oppose the final version of the Legislative Branch Appropriations bill, which includes language that would ban funding for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). While ACORN has fallen under media scrutiny for actions reported by the media, no criminal charges have been filed against ACORN, no indictment has been reached against ACORN, and no trial by jury has taken place regarding ACORN."So what? She and the Democrats persecuted Bush, Cheney and others while ignoring the blatant acts by William "Cold Cash" Jefferson, Charles Rangel and other Democrats.
"I support an investigation of ACORN, and ACORN has already moved forward with an objective, unbiased investigation of these allegations. Instead of acting on factual data, Congress is reacting based on media reports of alleged wrongdoing. All Americans have the presumption of innocence. With this vote, Congress has ignored this presumption, and the Constitution, as well. This vote against ACORN—or any liberal, conservative, or independent organization without merit—is wrong. In these economically and socially difficult times, Congress must utilize leadership, reason, sense, and sanity. This vote is not sound leadership, and it is not what the American people expect or need."I'm not sure if the investigator is unbiased. And since when has Congress relied on factual data? The fiction of our budgets, health care reform and other fallacies clearly illustrates that facts are to be ignored when inconvenient.
"Congress should not, and must not, start punishing individuals, businesses, or groups without a fair trial. Congress must not assume guilt based on media reports, Internet chat rooms, or anything less than a complete and full investigation of the facts by the appropriate law enforcement agency. Some Members of Congress have even questioned the Constitutionality of Congress’ refusing funds to inflict punishment on individuals without a fair trial. While I am not an expert on the Constitution, I do know that we must protect the rights of all individuals. The language in this bill, which would ban federal funds for ACORN for the length of any Continuing Budget Resolution, is wrong. It is wrong to punish organizations or individuals without trial, and it is wrong because it totally obscures the good work that groups like ACORN have done for years. It is wrong because Congress must lead and not follow."I don't even know where to start with that one. That block is so full of hooey it's oozing all over the screen.
"ACORN has operated for almost 20 years fighting for poor people. The organization has registered voters and attained housing for low income individuals and families."Missed the grammar on that section. But at least she didn't pull the race card.
"This vote sets a very chilling precedent of acting first and asking questions or investigating later. I do not know the merits, or lack thereof, of ACORN’s alleged wrongdoing. I do know that when Congress acts without the complete set of facts and does not consider the ramifications that this precedent sets, it hurts all Americans."Not very logical is it? How can this be a precedent, when Congress has acted this way in the past?
Let's just say that we disagree on matter.
Recent Comments